Open Access

Zinc and SARS‑CoV‑2: A molecular modeling study of Zn interactions with RNA‑dependent RNA‑polymerase and 3C‑like proteinase enzymes

  • Authors:
    • Ali Pormohammad
    • Nadia K. Monych
    • Raymond J. Turner
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 18, 2020     https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2020.4790
  • Pages: 326-334
  • Copyright: © Pormohammad et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

RNA‑dependent RNA‑polymerase (RdRp) and 3C‑like proteinase (3CLpro) are two main enzymes that play a key role in the replication of SARS‑CoV‑2. Zinc (Zn) has strong immunogenic properties and is known to bind to a number of proteins, modulating their activities. Zn also has a history of use in viral infection control. Thus, the present study models potential Zn binding to RdRp and the 3CLpro. Through molecular modeling, the Zn binding sites in the aforementioned two important enzymes of viral replication were found to be conserved between severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)‑coronavirus (CoV) and SARS‑CoV‑2. The location of these sites may influence the enzymatic activity of 3CLpro and RdRp in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19). Since Zn has established immune health benefits, is readily available, non‑expensive and a safe food supplement, with the comparisons presented here between SARS‑CoV and COVID‑19, the present study proposes that Zn could help ameliorate the disease process of COVID‑19 infection.

Introduction

Zinc (Zn) is an essential metal involved in cell signalling, proliferation, differentiation, oxidative stress, the immune response and numerous other important cellular processes (1-4). The role of Zn in cells is primarily associated with Zn binding as a cofactor in enzymes, or for structural and/or regulatory functions of proteins (5). The immune system is highly dependent on Zn homeostasis for proper and efficient function. Zn is an integral part of the signalling pathways involved in regulating both the innate and adaptive immune responses (3). In individuals with Zn deficiency, these signals are highly perturbed, affecting both T-cell and B-cell development and function, natural killer cell production and monocyte cytotoxicity (3). Due to these perturbations individuals with Zn deficiency are more susceptible to infection (6). In this regard, Zn supplements are heralded to boost the immune system.

The use of Zn against viruses has been studied from the 1970s to present, where Zn was shown to affect viral replication, protein synthesis and processing, membrane fusion and RNA polymerase activity (7-21). A summary of the influence of Zn on several respiratory viruses is provided in Table I.

Table 1

The influence of zinc, zinc conjugates and zinc ionophores on respiratory viruses.

Table 1

The influence of zinc, zinc conjugates and zinc ionophores on respiratory viruses.

Virus familyStrainAntiviral mechanismZinc formulation and effective concentration
CoronavirusesSARS-CoVReduced viral replication (11)2 µM ZnOAc2 + 2 µM PT
Inhibited RNA synthesis and RdRp activity and template binding (11)50 µM to 6 mM ZnOAc2
Inhibition of 3CLpro activity (13)Zinc conjugated TDT (Ki=1.4 µM), EPDTC (Ki=1.0 µM), JMF1600 (Ki=0.32 µM) and JMF1586 (Ki =0.05 µM)
Inhibition of 3CLpro activity (12)Zn2+ ions (Ki=1.1 µM), 1-hydroxypyridine-2-thione zinc (Ki=0.17 µM)
PicornavriusesCVB3Reduced viral replication and disrupt polyprotein processing (14,15)0.1-10 µM ZnCl2 + 125 µM PDTC or 10 µM PT, 125 µM PDTC or 125 µM HK allowing Zn2+ cell influx
MengovirusReduced viral replication and disrupt polyprotein processing (14,15)0.1-10 µM ZnCl2 + 125 µM PDTC or 10 µM PT, 125 µM PDTC or 125 µM HK allowing Zn2+ cell influx
HRVSlight reduction in viral replication (16)0.l mM Zn gluconate or Zn lactate
Inhibition of RdRp activity (17)ZnCl2 (IC50=0.6 µM for PolyA/T template or 4.0 µM for sshRNA template)
HRVReduced viral replication and disrupt polyprotein processing (14,18)10 µM PT, 125 µM PDTC or 125 µM HK allowing Zn2+ cell influx
ParamyxoviridaeRSVReduced viral replication and penetration (19)0.1-10 mM of Zn acetate, Zn sulfate or Zn lactate
InfluenzaInfluenza AReduced viral-induced DNA fragmentation and caspase-3 activity (20)0.15 mM ZnSO4
H1N1Reduced virus titer post-infection (21)25-200 µg/ml PEGylated ZnO-NPs 75 µg/ml ZnO-NPs

[i] 3CLpro, 3-cysteine like proteinase; CVB3, coxsackievirus B3; EPDTC, N-ethyl-N-phenyldithiocarbamic acid zinc; HK, hinokitiol; HRV, human rhinovirus; IC50, half-maximal inhibitory concentration; JMF1586, bis(L-aspartato-N,O) zinc(II) ethanate; JMF1600, (nitrilotriacetato-N,O) zinc(II) acetate; Ki, inhibition constant; PDTC, pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate; PEG, polyethylene glycol; PT, pyrithione; RdRp, RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus; SARS-CoV, severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus; sshRNA, secondary structureless heteropolymeric RNA; TDT, toluene-3,4-dithiolato zinc; Zn, zinc; ZnO-NP, zinc oxide nanoparticle.

Clinical studies have linked Zn supplementation with less severe and reduced duration of symptoms along with lower recurrent infections for viral infections (6-7,22). Although there is an observed benefit of Zn in antiviral therapy, this is largely dependent on the type of infection as well as the concentration, formulation and subsequent redox species of Zn used (7). For example, the use of Zn to treat the common cold often caused by rhinoviruses has been extensively reviewed with large variability in treatment effectiveness (7,23-27). While there is evidence of the role of Zn in inhibiting other respiratory viruses such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-coronavirus (CoV), the efficacy of Zn in clinical trials against these has not been sufficiently studied with good rigour (7,11).

With the emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), several studies have explored the therapeutic potential of compounds previously used against similar coronaviruses, such as SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-CoV (28,29). Two essential proteins in coronaviruses include: i) RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase (RdRp), which is necessary for proper viral replication, a core enzyme of the viruses' multiprotein replication and transcription complex (30) and ii) 3C-like proteinase (3CLpro) or main protease, a cysteine protease that has two domains each containing β-barrel chymotrypsin-like folds (31). The active site of 3CLpro is located in the cleft between the two domains and is characterized by a catalytic Cys-His dyad, which is necessary for polyprotein processing and essential for viral replication (30,31). For this reason, compounds with the ability to inhibit these proteins are often used as antivirals (32,33).

Zn is often delivered as a complex with N-ethyl-N-phenyl dithiocarbamic acid zinc (EPDTC) or toluene-3,4-dithiolato zinc (TDT) (13). These Zn ionophores also contribute to protein binding and inhibit these enzymes (11,12). Zn-ligating compounds are proposed to aid in coordinating Zn in the catalytic site of 3CLpro, thus inhibiting proteinase activity (12,13). Alternatively, Zn ionophores are only thought to aid Zn cell entry where Zn2+ ions then act alone to inhibit RdRp, though how this inhibition occurs has not been fully elucidated (11,14).

The presents study performed bioinformatics analysis and modelled Zn binding sites onto RdRp and 3CLpro and proposed the hypothesis that Zn would modulate COVID-19 replication and ameliorate the infection and severity of symptoms.

Materials and methods

RdRp sequences and databases, multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree

The nucleotide sequence of RdRp for COVID-19 (GenBank accession no. MT042778.1), SARS RdRp (GenBank accession no. AY340092.1), influenza A PB1 (GenBank accession no. AJ620348.2), hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS5B (GenBank accession no. AJ608785.1), calcivirus RdRp (GenBank accession no. Y13703.1) and T7 Phage RdRp (GenBank accession no. M3830s28.1) was retrieved in FASTA format from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).

The amino acid sequence for COVID-19 nsp 12 (GenBank accession no. YP_009725307.1), SARS rep (UniProtKB accession no. R1AB_CVHSA), influenza A PB1 (GenBank accession no. AAK18013.1) and T7 Bacteriophage (T7 Phage) PHA (PDB accession no. 4RNP_C) was obtained from the following databases: NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/), UniProt (https://www.uniprot.org/), Protein Data Bank In Europe (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe/) and Worldwide Protein Data Bank (http://www.wwpdb.org/). For all DNA and protein phylogenetic trees and multiple sequence alignments, ClustalW and ClustalX were used (http://www.clustal.org/).

3CLpro sequences and databases, multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree

The nucleotide sequence of COVID-19 orf1ab (GenBank accession no. MT049951.1), SARS 3CLpro (GenBank accession no. AY609081.1), black queen cell virus (BQV) 3CLpro (GenBank accession no. KM232906.1), yellow head virus (YHV) 3CLpro (GenBank accession no. EU977577.1) and avian infectious bronchitis virus 3CLpro (GenBank accession no. Q157446.1) was retrieved in FASTA format from the same databases used for RdRp.

The amino acid sequence of 3CLpro COVID-19 nsp5A_3CLpro and nsp5B_3CLpro (NCBI Reference Sequence accession no. YP_009742612.1), SARS Peptidase_ C30 (PDB accession no. 3F9G_A), YHV Peptidase_C62 (GenBank accession no. ABL96309.1), BQV 3C-like protease (GenBank accession no. AIW60925.1) and European brown hare syndrome virus 3CLpro (NCBI Reference Sequence accession no. NP_786901.1) was retrieved in FASTA format from the same databases used for RdRp. For all DNA and protein phylogenetic trees and multiple sequence alignment, ClustalW and ClustalX were used (http://www.clustal.org/).

Structural analysis

The previously determined crystal structures of the RdRp of SARS-CoV (PDB accession no. 6NUR) (34) and COVID-19 (PDB accession no. 6M71) (35) were aligned using PyMOL Molecular Graphics system (version 1.2r3pre; Schrödinger, Inc.). The alignment was performed iteratively five times with a cut-off of 2.0 Å and a resulting root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) value of 0.588 for 7,027 atoms aligned out of a total 8,040 atoms. The crystal structures of the 3CL-protease of SARS-CoV bound to a Zn coordinating compound (TLD902; TDT) (PDB accession no. 2Z94) (13) and SARS-CoV-2 (PDB accession no. 6W63) (36) were also aligned iteratively five times with a cut-off of 2.0 Å and a resulting RMSD value of 0.621 for 1,985 atoms aligned out of a total 2,339 atoms in PyMol. The Zn binding sites were illustrated based on the location of Zn in the crystal structure of these proteins for SARS-CoV.

Results

RdRp and 3CLpro of SARS-CoV-2 multiple sequence alignments and phylogenetic trees

The present analysis revealed a high level of identity (81.5 for DNA and 96.2 for protein alignment) of COVID-19 RdRp with the enzyme from the SARS virus that belongs in the same virus family (Coronaviridae). The score, identity and similarity of RdRp DNA and amino acid sequences are shown in Tables SI and SII. Alignment of the DNA sequences of COVID-19 RdRp (GenBank accession no. MT042778.1) and SARS RdRp (GenBank accession no. AY340092.1) showed an 87.7% aligned score of the two sequences (Fig. 1 and Table SI). Moreover, an amino acid sequence alignment of COVID-19 nsp 12 (GenBank accession no. YP_009725307.1) and SARS rep (UniProtKB accession no. R1AB_CVHSA) showed an aligned score of 96.3% for the two sequences (Fig. 1 and Table SII). The alignment score, identity and similarity of RdRp DNA and amino acid sequences are shown in Tables SI and SII.

The same analysis was performed on the enzyme 3CLpro DNA sequence alignment of COVID-19 3CLpro (NCBI Reference Sequence accession no. YP_009742612.1) and 3CLpro (PDB accession no. 3F9G_A), which showed an aligned score of 82% between the two sequences (Fig. 2 and Table SIII). Moreover, an amino acid sequence alignment of COVID-19 nsp5A_3CLpro and nsp5B_3CLpro (NCBI Reference Sequence accession no. YP_009742612.1) and SARS Peptidase_C30 (PDB accession no. 3F9G_A) were aligned with a score of 95% (Fig. 2 and Table SIV). A phylogenetic tree based on COVID-19 and SARS 3CLpro DNA and amino acid sequences is shown in Fig. 2.

Structural analyses of Zn binding to RdRp and 3CLpro of SARS-CoV-2

Based on bioinformatic similarities, structural analyses were performed to evaluate the structural similarity between the RdRp of SARS-CoV and COVID-19 (Figs. 3 and 4). A structural alignment was performed on previously determined crystal structures for RdRp of SARS-CoV (PDB accession no. 6NUR) (34) and COVID-19 (PDB accession no. 6M71) (35). The alignment produced an RMSD value of 0.588 for 7,027 atoms aligned out of a total 8,040 atoms. The Zn binding sites, based on the crystal structure of the SARS-CoV RdRp, were conserved in the COVID-19 RdRp.

A structural alignment between 3CLpro of SARS-CoV (PDB accession no. 2Z94) (13) and COVID-19 (PDB accession no. 6W63) (36) was also performed based on previously determined crystal structures (Fig. 5). An RMSD value of 0.621 was obtained for 1,985 atoms aligned out of a total 2,339 atoms between these proteins. Similar to RdRp, the Zn binding site in the crystal structure of SARS-CoV 3CLpro was conserved for COVID-19.

Discussion

The antiviral activity of Zn was reported by several studies and shown to effect viral replication, protein synthesis and processing, membrane fusion and RNA polymerase activity (7-21). A previous study by Kirchdoerfer and Ward (34) indicated that RdRp-targeted drugs for SARS have the potential for COVID-19 treatment, and the present analysis suggested that there is similar potential of Zn-targeting RdRp enzymes from this group of viruses (37). Likewise, a phylogenetic tree based on COVID-19 and SARS RdRp DNA and amino acid sequences also supported in hypothesis. Two Zn binding sites were previously identified in the structure of SARS-CoV RdRp, which the present study has shown to be conserved in the COVID-19 RdRp. These sites were hypothesized by the authors of the structure to be important for proper folding of RdRp based on their location in the protein (34). However, it is possible that binding of Zn may also be allosterically regulatory and lead to catalytic inhibition of RdRp in SARS-CoV (11). More enzymology studies would be required to confirm the importance of these sites for either inhibition or folding by Zn atom binding. Previous structural studies with Zn-coordinating compounds and 3CLpro of SARS-CoV revealed that Zn bound to the catalytic dyad present in 3CLpro with the help of TDT (38). These residues are also found in the aligned structure of COVID-19 3CLpro at the same position, indicating that Zn would also bind to the COVID-19 enzyme catalytic residues. Both Zn alone and the Zn coordinating compounds were effective inhibitors of 3CLpro of SARS-CoV activity with a Ki of 1.1, 1.4 and 1.0 µM for Zn alone, TDT and EPDTC, respectively (12). Therefore, considering the current COVID-19 pandemic and the present data, the present study hypothesized that Zn supplementation would be applicable in clinical practice to modulate symptoms and replication of the virus.

With the emergent threat of the COVID-19 virus, several studies have explored the therapeutic potential of compounds previously used against similar coronaviruses (SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV) (28,29). Recent meta-analyses by our research group showed the similarities of COVID-19 with other respiratory viral infections such as SARS, MERS and influenzas (39,40). Clinical studies have linked Zn supplementation with less severe and reduced duration of symptoms along with lower recurrent infections for viral infections (6,7,22).

Several studies have identified lungs as one of the earlier organs to fail due to inflammation in COVID-19 cases (41-44). Lung failure is one of the most important leading causes of severe outcomes, including death, in these cases (41-46). Our recent meta-analysis on 52,251 confirmed cases of COVID-19 indicated an increase to pre-inflammatory factors such as IL-6 present in 52% of cases (39). Therefore, researchers are focusing on anti-inflammatory drugs such as anti-IL-6 for treatment of patients with COVID-19 (42,47-49). Previous studies revealed a key role for Zn in the regulation of inflammation, especially for lungs; Gammoh and Rink (50) reported that Zn is critical in the prevention of host-tissue damage by inflammation, controlling oxidative stress and regulating inflammatory cytokines. Zn is involved in modulating inflammation by decreasing IL-6 and pro-inflammatory responses via reducing NF-κB, the master regulator of pro-inflammatory responses (50). NF-κB can regulate inflammatory responses by targeting genes, such as TNF-α and IL-1β, as well as increasing the expression of A20 and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors-α genes (50,51). Moreover, a study by Knoell et al (52) showed that insufficient Zn can actually enhance lung inflammation.

Additionally, the overuse and abuse of antibiotics is of increasing concern, particularly during treatment of respiratory infections (53-56). Although co-infection of viruses and bacteria can occur, identifying these cases can be challenging (57,58). Lack of appropriate antimicrobial stewardship programs and overprescription and use of antibiotics in viral infections such as the novel COVID-19 can lead to antibiotic side effects and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) (59,60). Both suspected and confirmed cases of COVID-19 have received broad-spectrum antibiotics as there is currently no rapid method that distinguishes between cases which need antibiotic treatment and those that do not (61,62). Although it is lifesaving in some patients, in others this treatment may be excessive and lead to antibiotic side effects such as septic shock, killing normal microbiota and contribute to AMR (62-64).

Our research group has been investigating metal-based antimicrobials in response to the AMR era (65-69). A number of different metal elements being reintroduced into regular infection control applications have been observed (68). Studies have now established the antibacterial potency of Zn, as either a metal salt or metal oxide nanoparticle, against common pathogenic strains (70) and clinical isolates (71-73). Therefore, the use of Zn can be considered for use in both viral and bacterial disease states.

Zn is recommended by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for inducing the immune system and preventing viral infections; however, the amount of Zn people requires each day depends on age (74). While Zn supplementation is necessary to correct any deficiency, an overabundance of Zn can also lead to a variety of physiological dysfunctions. Excess Zn can lead to copper deficiency, alter lymphocyte response and inhibit T-cell function (75). Therefore, the use of Zn for therapeutic purposes should still be monitored based on food intake and use of supplements. Although Zn is relatively non-toxic to humans with an median lethal dose of 3 g/kg weight, extreme excess Zn (>100-300 mg/day) should be avoided; the NIH considers 40 mg of zinc a day for adults and 4 mg of zinc a day for infants under 6 months to be the upper limit dose (75).

The aforementioned points support the potential use of Zn in the clinical treatment of COVID-19 patients. However, the main obstacle for the current study is limited supportive clinical data for prevention and treatment potency of Zn in patients with COVID-19.

Most people obtain their daily required Zn through a healthy diet. However, the dietary oral intake supplements of 15-25 mg Zn tablets per day is recommended to help aid immune response in the short term (4). Currently, there is no consensus that Zn is helpful for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection. However, the present bioinformatics and molecular modeling analysis supported the hypothesis that Zn would bind and regulate the enzymatic activities of 3CLpro and RdRp of SARS-CoV-2 and thus inhibit viral replication. Further studies would be necessary to identify the exact mechanism by which this could occur in the COVID-19 viral-cell cycle processes. More studies are necessary to understand the molecular mechanisms, effective concentration and delivery formulations. Zn may be considered a candidate for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection.

Supplementary Data

Funding

This study was supported by the National Sciences Engineering Research Council of Canada to RJT.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors' contributions

AP and RJT conceived and designed the study; NKM and AP performed comprehensive research; AP and NKM analyzed the data; AP, NKM and RJT wrote and revised the paper; AP, NKM and RJT participated in data analysis and manuscript editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

References

1 

Beyersmann D and Haase H: Functions of zinc in signaling, proliferation and differentiation of mammalian cells. Biometals. 14:331–341. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Marreiro D do N, Cruz KJ, Morais JB, Beserra JB, Severo JS and Soares de Oliveira AR: Zinc and oxidative stress: Current mechanisms. Antioxidants (Basel). 6:242017. View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Maywald M, Wessels I and Rink L: Zinc signals and immunity. Int J Mol Sci. 18:22222017. View Article : Google Scholar :

4 

Miller BD and Welch RM: Food system strategies for preventing micronutrient malnutrition. Food Policy. Wolters Kluwer-Medknow Publications; pp. 115–128. 2013, View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Kochańczyk T, Drozd A and Krężel A: Relationship between the architecture of zinc coordination and zinc binding affinity in proteins-Insights into zinc regulation. Metallomics. 7:244–257. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Prasad AS: Impact of the discovery of human zinc deficiency on health. J Am Coll Nutr. 28:257–265. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Read SA, Obeid S, Ahlenstiel C and Ahlenstiel G: The role of zinc in antiviral immunity. Adv Nutr. 10:696–710. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Korant BD and Butterworth BE: Inhibition by zinc of rhinovirus protein cleavage: Interaction of zinc with capsid polypeptides. J Virol. 18:298–306. 1976. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Kaushik N, Subramani C, Anang S, Muthumohan R, Shalimar, Nayak B, Ranjith-Kumar CT and Surjit M: Zinc salts block hepatitis E virus replication by inhibiting the activity of viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. J Virol. 91:e00754–e00717. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Korant BD, Kauer JC and Butterworth BE: Zinc ions inhibit replication of rhinoviruses. Nature. 248:588–590. 1974. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

te Velthuis AJ, van den Worml SH, Sims AC, Baric RS, Snijder EJ and van Hemert MJ: Zn2+ inhibits coronavirus and arterivirus RNA polymerase activity in vitro and zinc ionophores block the replication of these viruses in cell culture. PLoS Pathog. 6:e10011762010. View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Hsu JTA, Kuo CJ, Hsieh HP, Wang YC, Huang KK, Lin CPC, Huang PF, Chen X and Liang PH: Evaluation of metal-conjugated compounds as inhibitors of 3CL protease of SARS-CoV. FEBS Lett. 574:116–120. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Lee CC, Kuo CJ, Hsu MF, Liang PH, Fang JM, Shie JJ and Wang AH: Structural basis of mercury- and zinc-conjugated complexes as SARS-CoV 3C-like protease inhibitors. FEBS Lett. 581:5454–5458. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Krenn BM, Gaudernak E, Holzer B, Lanke K, Van Kuppeveld FJ and Seipelt J: Antiviral activity of the zinc ionophores pyrithione and hinokitiol against picornavirus infections. J Virol. 83:58–64. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar :

15 

Lanke K, Krenn BM, Melchers WJ, Seipelt J and van Kuppeveld FJ: PDTC inhibits picornavirus polyprotein processing and RNA replication by transporting zinc ions into cells. J Gen Virol. 88:1206–1217. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Geist FC, Bateman JA and Hayden FG: In vitro activity of zinc salts against human rhinoviruses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 31:622–624. 1987. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Hung M, Gibbs CS and Tsiang M: Biochemical characterization of rhinovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Antiviral Res. 56:99–114. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Krenn BM, Holzer B, Gaudernak E, Triendl A, van Kuppeveld FJ and Seipelt J: Inhibition of polyprotein processing and RNA replication of human rhinovirus by pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate involves metal ions. J Virol. 79:13892–13899. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Suara RO and Crowe JE: Effect of zinc salts on respiratory syncytial virus replication. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 48:783–790. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Srivastava V, Rawall S, Vijayan VK and Khanna M: Influenza a virus induced apoptosis: Inhibition of DNA laddering & caspase-3 activity by zinc supplementation in cultured HeLa cells. Indian J Med Res. 129:579–586. 2009.PubMed/NCBI

21 

Ghaffari H, Tavakoli A, Moradi A, Tabarraei A, Bokharaei-Salim F, Zahmatkeshan M, Farahmand M, Javanmard D, Kiani SJ, Esghaei M, et al: Inhibition of H1N1 influenza virus infection by zinc oxide nanoparticles: Another emerging application of nanomedicine. J Biomed Sci. 26:702019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Shankar AH and Prasad AS: Zinc and immune function: The biological basis of altered resistance to infection. Am J Clin Nutr. 68(Suppl 2): 447S–463S. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Hulisz D: Efficacy of zinc against common cold viruses: An overview. J Am Pharm Assoc 2003. 44:594–603. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Hemilä H, Fitzgerald JT, Petrus EJ and Prasad A: Zinc acetate lozenges may improve the recovery rate of common cold patients: An individual patient data meta-analysis. Open Forum Infect Dis. 4:ofx0592017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Science M, Johnstone J, Roth DE, Guyatt G and Loeb M: Zinc for the treatment of the common cold: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. CMAJ. 184:E551–E561. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

D'Cruze H, Arroll B and Kenealy T: Is intranasal zinc effective and safe for the common cold? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prim Health Care. 1:134–139. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Caruso TJ, Prober CG and Gwaltney JM Jr: Treatment of naturally acquired common colds with zinc: A structured review. Clin Infect Dis. 45:569–574. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Zhou Y, Hou Y, Shen J, Huang Y, Martin W and Cheng F: Network-based drug repurposing for novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2. Cell Discov. 6:142020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Lung J, Lin YS, Yang YH, Chou YL, Shu LH, Cheng YC, Liu HT and Wu CY: The potential chemical structure of anti-SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. J Med Virol. 92:693–697. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Prentice E, McAuliffe J, Lu X, Subbarao K and Denison MR: Identification and characterization of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus replicase proteins. J Virol. 78:9977–9986. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Fan K, Wei P, Feng Q, Chen S, Huang C, Ma L, Lai B, Pei J, Liu Y, Chen J and Lai L: Biosynthesis, purification, and substrate specificity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 3C-like proteinase. J Biol Chem. 279:1637–1642. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Subissi L, Imbert I, Ferron F, Collet A, Coutard B, Decroly E and Canard B: SARS-CoV ORF1b-encoded nonstructural proteins 12-16: Replicative enzymes as antiviral targets. Antiviral Res. 101:122–130. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Wu YS, Lin WH, Hsu JT and Hsieh HP: Antiviral drug discovery against SARS-CoV. Curr Med Chem. 13:2003–2020. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Kirchdoerfer RN and Ward AB: Structure of the SARS-CoV nsp12 polymerase bound to nsp7 and nsp8 co-factors. Nat Commun. 10:23422019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Gao Y, Yan L, Huang Y, Liu F, Zhao Y, Cao L, Wang T, Sun Q, Ming Z, Zhang L, et al: Structure of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase from COVID-19 virus. Science. 368:779–782. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Mesecar AD; Center for Structural Genomics of Infectious Diseases (CSGID): RCSB PDB-6W63: Structure of COVID-19 main protease bound to potent broad-spectrum non-covalent inhibitor X77. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIH/NIAID); 2020

37 

Nitulescu GM, Paunescu H, Moschos SA, Petrakis D, Nitulescu G, Ion GND, Spandidos DA, Nikolouzakis TK, Drakoulis N and Tsatsakis A: Comprehensive analysis of drugs to treat SARS-CoV-2 infection: Mechanistic insights into current COVID-19 therapies (Review). Int J Mol Med. 46:467–488. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Lee CC, Kuo CJ, Ko TP, Hsu MF, Tsui YC, Chang SC, Yang S, Chen SJ, Chen HC, Hsu MC, et al: Structural basis of inhibition specificities of 3C and 3C-like proteases by zinc-coordinating and peptidomimetic compounds. J Biol Chem. 284:7646–7655. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Pormohammad A, Ghorbani S, Khatami A, Farzi R, Baradaran B, Turner DL, Turner RJ, Bahr NC and Idrovo JP: Comparison of confirmed COVID-19 with SARS and MERS cases-clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, radiographic signs and outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Med Virol. 30:e21122020. View Article : Google Scholar

40 

Pormohammad A, Ghorbani S, Khatami A, Razizadeh MH, Alborzi E, Zarei M, Idrovo JP and Turner RJ: Comparison of influenza type A and B with COVID-19: A global systematic review and meta-analysis on clinical, laboratory and radio-graphic findings. Rev Med Virol. Oct 9–2020.Epub ahead of print. View Article : Google Scholar

41 

Zhou Y, Fu B, Zheng X, Wang D, Zhao C, Qi Y, Sun R, Tian Z, Xu X and Wei H: Pathogenic T cells and inflammatory monocytes incite inflammatory storm in severe COVID-19 patients. Natl Sci Rev. Mar 13–2020.Epub ahead of print. View Article : Google Scholar

42 

Conti P, Ronconi G, Caraffa A, Gallenga C, Ross R, Frydas I and Kritas S: Induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1 and IL-6) and lung inflammation by coronavirus-19 (COVI-19 or SARS-CoV-2): Anti-inflammatory strategies. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 34:327–331. 2020.PubMed/NCBI

43 

Shi Y, Wang Y, Shao C, Huang J, Gan J, Huang X, Bucci E, Piacentini M, Ippolito G and Melino G: COVID-19 infection: The perspectives on immune responses. Cell Death Differ. 27:14512020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, Sanchez E, Tattersall RS and Manson JJ; HLH Across Speciality Collaboration, UK: COVID-19: Consider cytokine storm syndromes and immuno-suppression. Lancet. 395:1033–1034. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Skalny AV, Rink L, Ajsuvakova OP, Aschner M, Gritsenko VA, Alekseenko SI, Svistunov AA, Petrakis D, Spandidos DA, Aaseth J, et al: Zinc and respiratory tract infections: Perspectives for CoviD'19 (Review). Int J Mol Med. 46:17–26. 2020.PubMed/NCBI

46 

Wessels I, Rolles B and Rink L: The potential impact of zinc supplementation on COVID-19 pathogenesis. Front Immunol. 11:17122020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Stebbing J, Phelan A, Griffin I, Tucker C, Oechsle O, Smith D and Richardson P: COVID-19: Combining antiviral and anti-inflammatory treatments. Lancet Infect Dis. 20:400–402. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Favalli EG, Ingegnoli F, De Lucia O, Cincinelli G, Cimaz R and Caporali R: COVID-19 infection and rheumatoid arthritis: Faraway, so close! Autoimmun Rev. 19:1025232020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Zhang W, Zhao Y, Zhang F, Wang Q, Li T, Liu Z, Wang J, Qin Y, Zhang X, Yan X, et al: The use of anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of people with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): The experience of clinical immunologists from China. Clin Immunol. 214:1083932020. View Article : Google Scholar

50 

Gammoh NZ and Rink L: Zinc in infection and inflammation. Nutrients. 9:6242017. View Article : Google Scholar :

51 

Jarosz M, Olbert M, Wyszogrodzka G, Młyniec K and Librowski T: Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of zinc. Zinc-dependent NF-κB signaling. Inflammopharmacology. 25:11–24. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Knoell DL, Smith DA, Sapkota M, Heires AJ, Hanson CK, Smith LM, Poole JA, Wyatt TA and Romberger DJ: Insufficient zinc intake enhances lung inflammation in response to agricultural organic dust exposure. J Nutr Biochem. 70:56–64. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

53 

Fischer KJ, Yajjala VK, Bansal S, Bauer C, Chen R and Sun K: Monocytes represent one source of bacterial shielding from antibiotics following influenza virus infection. J Immunol. 202:2027–2034. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

54 

Zhang L, Forst CV, Gordon A, Gussin G, Geber AB, Fernandez PJ, Ding T, Lashua L, Wang M, Balmaseda A, et al: Characterization of antibiotic resistance and host-microbiome interactions in the human upper respiratory tract during influenza infection. Microbiome. 8:392020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

55 

Llor C and Bjerrum L: Antimicrobial resistance: Risk associated with antibiotic overuse and initiatives to reduce the problem. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 5:229–241. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

56 

Kostoff RN, Briggs MB, Porter AL, Hernández AF, Abdollahi M, Aschner M and Tsatsakis A: The under-reported role of toxic substance exposures in the COVID-19 pandemic. Food Chem Toxicol. 145:1116872020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

57 

Çaǧlayan Serin D, Pullukçu H, Çiçek C, Sipahi OR, Taşbakan S, Atalay S and Pneumonia Study Group: Bacterial and viral etiology in hospitalized community acquired pneumonia with molecular methods and clinical evaluation. J Infect Dev Ctries. 8:510–518. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar

58 

Matson MJ, Stock F, Shupert WL, Bushmaker T, Feldmann F, Bishop WB, Frank KM, Dekker JP, Chertow DS and Munster VJ: Compatibility of maximum-containment virus-inactivation protocols with identification of bacterial coinfections by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J Infect Dis. 218(Suppl 5): S297–S300. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

59 

Stevens MP, Patel PK and Nori P: Involving antimicrobial stewardship programs in COVID-19 response efforts: All hands on deck. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 41:744–745. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

60 

Essack S, Bell J, Burgoyne DS, Duerden M and Shephard A: Topical (local) antibiotics for respiratory infections with sore throat: An antibiotic stewardship perspective. J Clin Pharm Ther. 44:829–837. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

61 

Sohrabi C, Alsafi Z, O'Neill N, Khan M, Kerwan A, Al-Jabir A, Iosifidis C and Agha R: World Health Organization declares global emergency: A review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Int J Surg. 76:71–76. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

62 

Denny KJ, De Wale J, Laupland KB, Harris PNA and Lipman J: When not to start antibiotics: Avoiding antibiotic overuse in the intensive care unit. Clin Microbiol Infect. 26:35–40. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar

63 

Song Z, Hu Y, Zheng S, Yang L and Zhao R: Hospital pharmacists' pharmaceutical care for hospitalized patients with COVID-19: Recommendations and guidance from clinical experience. Res Social Adm Pharm. Apr 3–2020.Epub ahead of print. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

64 

Gupta S, Sakhuja A, Kumar G, McGrath E, Nanchal RS and Kashani KB: Culture-negative severe sepsis: Nationwide trends and outcomes. Chest. 150:1251–1259. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

65 

Lemire JA, Harrison JJ and Turner RJ: Antimicrobial activity of metals: Mechanisms, molecular targets and applications. Nat Rev Microbiol. 11:371–384. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

66 

Turner RJ, Gugala N and Lemire J: Can metals replace traditional antibiotics? Adjac Gov. November;46–47. 2016.

67 

Lemire JA and Turner RJ: Mechanisms underlying the anti-microbial capacity of metals. Stress and Environmental Regulation of Gene Expression and Adaptation in Bacteria. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; Hoboken, NJ: pp. 215–224. 2016, View Article : Google Scholar

68 

Turner RJ: Metal-based antimicrobial strategies. Microb Biotechnol. 10:1062–1065. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

69 

Monych NK, Gugala N and Turner RJ: Chapter 9. Metal-based Antimicrobials. Antimicrobial Materials for Biomedical Applications. Thomas Graham House; Cambridge: pp. 252–276. 2019, View Article : Google Scholar

70 

Gugala N, Lemire JA and Turner RJ: The efficacy of different anti-microbial metals at preventing the formation of, and eradicating bacterial biofilms of pathogenic indicator strains. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 70:775–780. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar

71 

Jesline A, John NP, Narayanan PM, Vani C and Murugan S: Antimicrobial activity of zinc and titanium dioxide nanoparticles against biofilm-producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Appl Nanosci. 5:157–162. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

72 

Wang X, Du Y and Liu H: Preparation, characterization and anti-microbial activity of chitosan-Zn complex. Carbohydr Polym. 56:21–26. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar

73 

Gugala N, Vu D, Parkins MD and Turner RJ: Specificity in the susceptibilities of escherichia coli, pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates to six metal antimicrobials. Antibiotics (Basel). 8:512019. View Article : Google Scholar

74 

National Institutes of Health: Vitamin K - Fact Sheet for Health Professionals. https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/vita-minK-HealthProfessional/urisimplehttps://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/vita-minK-HealthProfessional/ Accessed June 3, 2020.

75 

Plum LM, Rink L and Hajo H: The essential toxin: Impact of zinc on human health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 7:1342–1365. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

January-2021
Volume 47 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1107-3756
Online ISSN:1791-244X

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Pormohammad A, Monych NK and Turner RJ: Zinc and SARS‑CoV‑2: A molecular modeling study of Zn interactions with RNA‑dependent RNA‑polymerase and 3C‑like proteinase enzymes. Int J Mol Med 47: 326-334, 2021.
APA
Pormohammad, A., Monych, N.K., & Turner, R.J. (2021). Zinc and SARS‑CoV‑2: A molecular modeling study of Zn interactions with RNA‑dependent RNA‑polymerase and 3C‑like proteinase enzymes. International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 47, 326-334. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2020.4790
MLA
Pormohammad, A., Monych, N. K., Turner, R. J."Zinc and SARS‑CoV‑2: A molecular modeling study of Zn interactions with RNA‑dependent RNA‑polymerase and 3C‑like proteinase enzymes". International Journal of Molecular Medicine 47.1 (2021): 326-334.
Chicago
Pormohammad, A., Monych, N. K., Turner, R. J."Zinc and SARS‑CoV‑2: A molecular modeling study of Zn interactions with RNA‑dependent RNA‑polymerase and 3C‑like proteinase enzymes". International Journal of Molecular Medicine 47, no. 1 (2021): 326-334. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2020.4790