Open Access

Screening and identification of key biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma: Evidence from bioinformatic analysis

  • Authors:
    • Lin Li
    • Qingsong Lei
    • Shujun Zhang
    • Lingna Kong
    • Bo Qin
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 7, 2017     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2017.5946
  • Pages: 2607-2618
  • Copyright: © Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. Intense efforts have been made to elucidate the pathogeny, but the molecular mechanisms of HCC are still not well understood. To identify the candidate genes in the carcinogenesis and progression of HCC, microarray datasets GSE19665, GSE33006 and GSE41804 were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, and function enrichment analyses were performed. The protein-protein interaction network (PPI) was constructed and the module analysis was performed using STRING and Cytoscape. A total of 273 DEGs were identified, consisting of 189 downregulated genes and 84 upregulated genes. The enriched functions and pathways of the DEGs include protein activation cascade, complement activation, carbohydrate binding, complement and coagulation cascades, mitotic cell cycle and oocyte meiosis. Sixteen hub genes were identified and biological process analysis revealed that these genes were mainly enriched in cell division, cell cycle and nuclear division. Survival analysis showed that BUB1, CDC20, KIF20A, RACGAP1 and CEP55 may be involved in the carcinogenesis, invasion or recurrence of HCC. In conclusion, DEGs and hub genes identified in the present study help us understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the carcinogenesis and progression of HCC, and provide candidate targets for diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), mainly induced by chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, hepatic cirrhosis or alcoholic liver diseases, is one of the most common malignancies with a rise in new cases worldwide each year. HCC has a higher rate in developing countries partly East Asia as compared to developed countries (1). Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that abnormal expression and mutation of genes are involved in the carcinogenesis and progression of HCC, including cyclin D1 (CCND1), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), c-myc and Ras, as well as mutations of tumor-suppressor genes. It was found that the G870A polymorphism in exon 4 of the CCND1 gene may increase the risk of HBV-related HCC in the Chinese population (2). The chronic stimulation of EGFR plays a key role in the neoplastic conversion and development of HCC (3). A progressive increase in c-myc mRNA and protein was noted during the different steps of malignancy of HCC (4). Aberrant activation of different levels of the Ras pathway could play important roles in HCC. In addition, overexpression of H-ras, DNA copy number gains of B-Raf and hypermethylation of Ras binding proteins were found to be involved in the poor prognosis of HCC patients (5). However, due to the lack of effective diagnostic methods at the early stage of the disease, the mortality rate of HCC remains high. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the precise molecular mechanisms involved in the carcinogenesis, proliferation and recurrence of HCC and thus develop effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

During the last decades, microarray technology and bioinformatic analysis have been widely used to screen genetic alterations at the genome level, which have helped us identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and functional pathways involved in the carcinogenesis and progression of HCC. However, false-positive rates in independent microarray analysis make it difficult to obtain reliable results. Thus, in the present study, 3 mRNA microarray datasets from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) were downloaded and analyzed to obtain DEGs between liver cancer tissues and non-cancerous tissues. Subsequently, Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis and protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analyses were performed to help us understand the molecular mechanisms underlying carcinogenesis and progression. In conclusion, a total of 273 DEGs and 16 hub genes were identified, which may be candidate biomarkers for HCC.

Materials and methods

Microarray data

GEO (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo) (6) is a public functional genomics data repository of high throughout gene expression data, chips and microarrays. Three gene expression datasets [GSE36668 (7), GSE18520 (8) and GSE14407 (9)] were downloaded from GEO (Affymetrix GPL570 platform, Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array). The probes were converted into the corresponding gene symbol according to the annotation information in the platform. The GSE19665 dataset contained 10 HCC tissue samples and 10 non-cancerous samples. GSE33006 contained 3 HCC samples and 3 non-cancerous samples. GSE41804 contained 20 HCC samples and 20 non-cancerous samples.

Identification of DEGs

The DEGs between HCC and non-cancerous samples were screened using GEO2R (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/geo2r). GEO2R is an interactive web tool that allows users to compare two or more datasets in a GEO series in order to identify DEGs across experimental conditions. The adjusted P-values (adj. P) and Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate were applied to provide a balance between discovery of statistically significant genes and limitations of false-positives. Probe sets without corresponding gene symbols or genes with more than one probe set were removed or averaged, respectively. logFC (fold change) >1 and adj. P-value <0.01 were considered statistically significant.

KEGG and GO enrichment analyses of DEGs

The Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID; http://david.ncifcrf.gov) (version 6.7) (10) is an online biological information database that integrates biological data and analysis tools, and provides a comprehensive set of functional annotation information of genes and proteins for users to extract biological information. KEGG is a database resource for understanding high-level functions and biological systems from large-scale molecular datasets generated by high-throughput experimental technologies (11). GO is a major bioinformatics tool to annotate genes and analyze biological process of these genes (12). To analyze the function of DEGs, biological analyses were performed using DAVID online database. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

PPI network construction and module analysis

The PPI network was predicted using Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING; http://string-db.org) (version 10.0) (13) online database. Analyzing the functional interactions between proteins may provide insights into the mechanisms of generation or development of diseases. In the present study, PPI network of DEGs was constructed using STRING database, and an interaction with a combined score >0.4 was considered statistically significant. Cytoscape (version 3.4.0) is an open source bioinformatics software platform for visualizing molecular interaction networks (14). The plug-in Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE) (version 1.4.2) of Cytoscape is an APP for clustering a given network based on topology to find densely connected regions (15). The PPI networks were drawn using Cytoscape and the most significant module in the PPI networks was identified using MCODE. The criteria for selection were as follows: MCODE scores >5, degree cut-off=2, node score cut-off=0.2, Max depth=100 and k-score=2. Subsequently, the KEGG and GO analyses for genes in this module were performed using DAVID.

Hub genes selection and analysis

The hub genes were selected with degrees ≥10. A network of the genes and their co-expression genes was analyzed using cBioPortal (http://www.cbioportal.org) (16,17) online platform. The biological process analysis of hub genes was performed and visualized using Biological Networks Gene Oncology tool (BiNGO) (version 3.0.3) plugin of Cytoscape (18). Hierarchical clustering of hub genes was constructed using UCSC Cancer Genomics Browser (http://genome-cancer.ucsc.edu) (19). The overall survival and disease-free survival analyses of hub genes were performed using Kaplan-Meier curve in cBioPortal. The expression profiles of TOP2A and CDK1 were analyzed and displayed using online database Serial Analysis of Gene Expression (SAGE; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SAGE). The relationship between expression patterns and tumor grades, hepatitis virus infection status, satellites and vascular invasion were analyzed using online database Oncomine (http://www.oncomine.com) (2022).

Results

Identification of DEGs in HCC

After standardization of the microarray results, DEGs (1,558 in GSE19665, 1,330 in GSE33006 and 717 in GSE41804) were identified. The overlap among the 3 datasets contained 273 genes as shown in the Venn diagram (Fig. 1A), consisting of 189 downregulated genes and 84 upregulated genes between liver cancer tissues and non-cancerous tissues.

KEGG and GO enrichment analyses of DEGs

To analyze the biological classification of DEGs, functional and pathway enrichment analyses were performed using DAVID. GO analysis results showed that changes in biological processes (BP) of DEGs were significantly enriched in protein activation cascade, complement activation, defense response, mitotic cell cycle and cell cycle process (Table I). Changes in molecular function (MF) were mainly enriched in carbohydrate binding, oxidoreductase activity, mannose-binding, scavenger receptor activity and monosaccharide binding (Table I). Changes in cell component (CC) of DEGs were mainly enriched in the extracellular region, membrane attack complex and chromosome (Table I). KEGG pathway analysis revealed that the downregulated DEGs were mainly enriched in complement and coagulation cascades, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis and metabolic pathways, while the upregulated DEGs were mainly enriched in oocyte meiosis, cell cycle and progesterone-mediated oocyte maturation.

Table I.

GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of DEGs in HCC samples.

Table I.

GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of DEGs in HCC samples.

TermDescriptionCount in gene setP-value
Downregulated
  GO:0072376Protein activation cascade165.27E-15
  GO:0006956Complement activation145.47E-15
  GO:0006952Defense response412.24E-09
  GO:0030246Carbohydrate binding130.00398
  GO:0005537 Mannose-binding  40.0216
  GO:0016491Oxidoreductase activity180.0216
  GO:0005615Extracellular space421.89E-11
  GO:0005576Extracellular region802.41E-10
  GO:0044421Extracellular region part696.95E-09
  Hsa04610Complement and coagulation cascades101.37E-07
  Hsa05020Prion diseases  60.000106
  Hsa00232Caffeine metabolism  30.000665
  Hsa01100Metabolic pathways250.00296
  Hsa00010 Glycolysis/gluconeogenesis  50.00958
Upregulated
  GO:0022402Cell cycle process454.36E-34
  GO:0007049Cell cycle489.01E-34
  GO:0000278Mitotic cell cycle416.08E-33
  GO:0000793Condensed chromosome153.67E-13
  GO:0005819Spindle173.67E-13
  GO:0005694Chromosome231.05E-12
  Hsa04110Cell cycle  93.84E-07
  Hsa04114Oocyte meiosis  60.00058
  Hsa04914 Progesterone-mediated oocyte maturation  50.00156

[i] GO, Gene Ontology; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; DEGs, differentially expressed genes; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.

PPI network construction and module analysis

The PPI network of DEGs was constructed (Fig. 1B) and the most significant module was obtained using Cytoscape (Fig. 1C). The functional analyses of genes involved in this module were analyzed using DAVID. Results showed that genes in this module were mainly enriched in cell division, mitotic nuclear division and cell cycle (Table II).

Table II.

GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of DEGs in the most significant module.

Table II.

GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of DEGs in the most significant module.

Pathway IDPathway descriptionCount in gene setFDR
GO:0051301Cell division149.99E-19
GO:0000280Nuclear division134.42E-17
GO:0007067Mitotic nuclear division123.42E-16
GO:1903047Mitotic cell cycle process131.75E-14
GO:0000278Mitotic cell cycle136.11E-14
GO:0005819Spindle  97.60E-11
GO:0000793Condensed chromosome  71.36E-08
GO:0000777Condensed chromosome kinetochore  61.98E-08
GO:0000779Condensed chromosome, centromeric region  62.18E-08
GO:0015630Microtubule cytoskeleton103.12E-08
Hsa04110Cell cycle  65.20E-08
Hsa04914 Progesterone-mediated oocyte maturation  43.91E-05
Hsa04114Oocyte meiosis  48.19E-05

[i] GO, Gene Ontology; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; DEGs, differentially expressed genes; FDR, false discovery rate.

Hub gene selection and analysis

A total of 16 genes were identified as hub genes with degrees ≥10. The names, abbreviations and functions for these hub genes are shown in Table III. A network of the hub genes and their co-expression genes was analyzed using cBioPortal online platform (Fig. 2A). The biological process analysis of the hub genes is shown in Fig. 2B. Hierarchical clustering showed that the hub genes could basically differentiate the liver cancer samples from the non-cancerous samples (Fig. 2C). Subsequently, the overall survival analysis of the hub genes was performed using Kaplan-Meier curve. HCC patients with BUB1, CCNB2, CDC20, CDK1, KIF20A, KIF2C, RACGAP1 and CEP55 alteration showed worse overall survival (Fig. 3A). Nonetheless, HCC patients with BUB1, CDC20, KIF20A, NUSAP1, RACGAP1, PRC1 and CEP55 alteration showed worse disease-free survival (Fig. 3B).

Table III.

Functional roles of 16 hub genes with degree ≥10.

Table III.

Functional roles of 16 hub genes with degree ≥10.

No.Gene symbolFull nameFunction
  1BIRC5Baculoviral IAP repeat containing 5BIRC5 may prevent apoptotic cell death and is highly expressed in most tumors
  2BUB1BUB1 mitotic checkpoint serine/threonine kinaseBUB1 promotes the progression of breast cancer
  3CCNB2Cyclin B2CCNB2 (cyclin B2) is associated with invasion, metastasis and poor prognosis of several cancers
  4CDC20Cell division cycle 20High expression of CDC20 is associated with development and progression of HCC
  5CDC25CCell division cycle 25CCDC25C can regulate the G2/M transition in HCC cells
  6CDK1Cyclin-dependent kinase 1CDK1 can regulate the cell cycle progression, apoptosis and carcinogenesis of tumor cells
  7CEP55Centrosomal protein 55High expression of CEP55 can promote the proliferation of lung, breast and thyroid cancers
  8CXCL12C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12High expression of CXCL12 in tumor cells may impede tumor spread
  9FOSFBJ murine osteosarcoma viral oncogene homologFOS has been implicated as a regulator of cell proliferation, differentiation and transformation
10KIF20AKinesin family member 20AHigh expression of KIF20A is involved in the development and progression of various cancers
11NUSAP1Nucleolar and spindle associated protein 1High expression of NUSAP1 is involved in the progression of prostate cancer
12KIF2CKinesin family member 2CKIF2C is overexpressed in various cancers and may be associated with the chemoresistance of ovarian cancer
13RACGAP1Rac GTPase activating protein 1RACGAP1 plays a regulatory role in cytokinesis, cell growth and differentiation
14PRC1Protein regulator of cytokinesis 1PRC1 may be a novel regulator of early HCC recurrence
15SPC24SPC24, NDC80 kinetochore complex componentHigh expression of SPC24 is associated with worse disease-free survival and overall survival in HCC
16TOP2ATopoisomerase (DNA) II αTOP2A acts as a target for several anticancer agents and mutations of this gene have been associated with drug resistance

Among these genes, TOP2A and CDK1 showed the highest node degrees with 33, suggesting that they may play important roles in the carcinogenesis or progression of HCC. Using the data from cBioPortal, we noted that HCC patients who had an association of genomic alterations in TOP2A showed reductions in overall and disease-free survival. However, those observations were not statistically significant (P=0.506 for overall survival and P=0.124 for disease-free survival). In addition, the CDK1 alteration was significantly associated with worse overall survival but not disease-free survival (P=0.00111 for overall survival and P=0.280 for disease-free survival) (Fig. 3B). The expression profile of TOP2A and CDK1 in human tissue was displayed using SAGE. We found that TOP2A mRNA in brain, retina, breast, pancreas, liver, kidney, colon and peritoneum displayed higher levels as compared with the matched normal tissues (Fig. 4A). CDK1 mRNA in brain, retina, thyroid, breast, pancreas, liver and prostate displayed higher levels as compared with the matched normal tissues (Fig. 4B). Oncomine analysis of cancer vs. normal tissue showed that TOP2A and CDK1 were significantly overexpressed in HCC in the different datasets (Fig. 5A and B). In the Wurmbach Liver dataset, higher mRNA levels of TOP2A and CDK1 were associated with tumor grade, hepatitis virus infection status, satellites and vascular invasion (Fig. 6A-H).

Discussion

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common malignant tumor worldwide and its mortality rate has increased in recent years (1). The main etiology factors of HCC include chronic infection with hepatitis viruses, gene mutations, cell damage, alcoholic liver diseases and aflatoxin poisoning (23). The most common cause is chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV), accounting for over 80% of HCC cases. However, the molecular mechanisms of HCC remain poorly understood. Cell cycle regulators play important roles in HCC. Mutation of cyclin D1 (CCND1), c-myc or Ras, hypermethylation of cyclin D2 (CCND2) promoter and aberrant expression of p53 or p21 have been reported to be involved in HCC (24,25). In addition, splicing alterations of NT5E, Sulf1 or SLC39A14 have been reported to be associated with HCC (2628). Most cases of HCC without an early finding are not candidates for curative therapies, which may be one of the reasons for the poor patient prognosis. Thus, potential markers for diagnosis and treatment with high efficiency are urgently demanded. Microarray technology enables us to explore the genetic alterations in HCC, and has been proved to be a useful approach to identify new biomarkers in other diseases.

In the present study, 3 mRNA microarray datasets were analyzed to obtain DEGs between liver cancer tissues and non-cancerous tissues. A total of 273 DEGs were identified among the 3 datasets, including 189 downregulated genes and 84 upregulated genes. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses were performed to explore interactions among the DEGs. The upregulated genes were mainly enriched in oocyte meiosis, mitotic cell cycle and cell cycle, while the downregulated genes were mainly enriched in protein activation cascade, complement activation and complement and coagulation cascades. Previous studies have reported that dysregulation of the cell cycle process and mitotic cell cycle play important roles in the carcinogenesis or progression of tumors (24,25,29). In addition, recent studies have brought forward a tumor-promoting role for complement activation (30). Moreover, oxidoreductase activity often plays a major role in antioxidant defense and can encode tumor suppressors that are frequently altered in tumors (31,32). In a word, all these theories are consistent with our results. GO enrichment analysis revealed that changes in the most significant modules were mainly enriched in cell division, nuclear division and mitotic cell cycle process, while changes in KEGG were mainly enriched in cell cycle, progesterone-mediated oocyte maturation and oocyte meiosis.

We selected 16 DEGs as hub genes with degrees ≥10. Among these hub genes, TOP2A and CDK1 showed the highest node degrees with 33. TOP2A, which forms breaks in double-stranded DNA and alters DNA structure during transcription, has been shown to be correlated with early age onset, microvascular invasion, shorter patient survival, chemoresistance and recurrence in HCC (33,34). Thus, it is regarded as a target for anticancer agents, such as epirubicin, doxorubicin, etoposide and temozolomide (3537). In HER2-amplified breast cancer, HER2 and TOP2A genes are frequently co-amplified (38). However, TOP2A overexpression in HCC is independent from HER2 amplification or overexpression (39). In addition, TOP2A overexpression has also been found in lung, colon and ovarian cancers, and may be regarded as a valuable biomarker for diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of tumors (4042). In the present study, PPI network showed that TOP2A directly interacts with CDK1, RACGAP1, BIRC5 and PRC1, indicating a key role of TOP2A in HCC. Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1), a serine/threonine kinase, regulates cell cycle progression by binding to cyclin B to form a complex called cyclin B-CDK1. miR-582-5p was found to regulate the progression of HCC by inhibiting the expression of CDK1 (43). CDK1 overexpression has also been found in lung, pancreas and other cancers. In addition to its role in cell cycle progression, cyclin B-CDK1 could interact with apoptin and regulate the subcellular localization of apoptin, leading to apoptosis and carcinogenesis (44). Survivin inactivates and blocks CDK1 by increasing the level of Wee1 and thus, inactivates and blocks the pro-apoptotic activity of CDK1 (45). Cyclin B-CDK1 is also involved in connecting mitotic arrest and apoptosis by mediating the phosphorylation of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 (46). We assessed the expression of TOP2A and CDK1 in relation to overall and disease-free survival. Gene alteration in TOP2A showed reductions in overall and disease-free survival. However, in the present study, those observations were not statistically significant. In addition, the CDK1 alteration was significantly associated with worse overall survival, but not disease-free survival. Nevertheless, several clinical studies have shown that overexpression of TOP2A is significantly associated with shorter survival times (37,39). We speculate that the reason may be that survival analyses in cBioPortal were performed on the basis of the relationship between gene mutation and prognosis, while gene overexpression usually arises from mutation or amplification. Thus, overexpression of TOP2A in HCC may arise from gene amplification rather than mutation, and further research is needed to confirm our hypothesis. Oncomine analysis showed that higher mRNA levels of TOP2A and CDK1 were associated with tumor grade, hepatitis virus infection status, satellites and vascular invasion, indicating vital roles of TOP2A and CDK1 in the carcinogenesis or progression of HCC.

RACGAP1, a Rac- and Cdc42-specific GAP, can suppress Rac and activate RhoA, leading to the promotion of pseudopod extension and invasion (47). Moreover, RACGAP1 shows a relationship with AURKA, a negative prognostic indicator in gastric cancer (48). BIRC5, also called survivin, is overexpressed and plays important roles in cell division and proliferation in a majority of cancers including HCC. PRC1 is involved in the microtubule organization in eukaryotes and is upregulated in breast tumors (49). Recent research has found that it can be a novel regulator of early HCC recurrence via potentiating Wnt signaling (50). High expression of CDC20 is associated with sex, differentiation, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, and p53 expression of HCC (51). The protein kinase CDC25C acts as an activator of cyclin B-CDK1 that regulates the G2/M transition in HCC cells (52). HCC patients with relatively low CXCL12 mRNA levels exhibit worse overall survival (53). A recent study found that the transcriptional activity of c-FOS could be induced by membrane melanoma cell adhesion molecule (MCAM), and it is important for MCAM-induced liver tumorigenesis (54). High expression of SPC24 is associated with worse disease-free and overall survival in HCC patients (55). High expression of KIF20A is involved in the development and progression of various cancers such as pancreatic, bladder and breast cancer. A recent study found that the glioma-associated oncogene 2/KIF20A axis is crucial for the proliferation of human HCC cells (56).

Literature retrieval results showed that the interaction among HCC and hub genes NUSAP1, CEP55, BUB1, CCNB2, KIF2C and RACGAP1 has not been widely reported. NUSAP1 regulates mitosis, and high expression of NUSAP1 is involved in the progression of prostate cancer (57). CEP55 is a centrosome-associated protein, which plays an important role in regulating the cell cycle. Overexpression of CEP55 was found to promote the proliferation of several cancers, such as pulmonary adenocarcinoma, breast cancer and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (5860). BUB1, a component of the spindle assembly checkpoint, is overexpressed and plays important roles in the progression of breast cancer (61). However, BUB1 has been reported to have a controversial role in spindle assembly checkpoint activation (62,63), which needs further investigation. CCNB2 is overexpressed in bladder, lung and colorectal cancers, and is associated with invasion, metastasis and poor prognosis of cancers (64,65). KIF2C plays an important role in the segregation of chromosomes in mitosis, and is overexpressed in various cancers and may be associated with the chemoresistance of ovarian cancer (66,67). In addition, we also performed hierarchical clustering for hub genes. Results showed that these hub genes differentiated HCC samples from non-cancerous samples, and may be candidates for diagnostic biomarkers. Moreover, alteration of BUB1, CDC20, KIF20A, RACGAP1 and CEP55 is involved in worse overall and disease-free survival, indicating that these genes may play important roles in the carcinogenesis, progression, invasion or recurrence of HCC.

In conclusion, the present study was designed to identify DEGs that may be involved in the carcinogenesis or progression of HCC. A total of 273 DEGs and 16 hub genes were identified and may be regarded as diagnostic biomarkers for HCC. However, further studies are needed to elucidate the biological function of these genes in HCC.

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported by a grant (no. 81271838) from the National Science Foundation of China.

References

1 

El-Serag HB and Rudolph KL: Hepatocellular carcinoma: Epidemiology and molecular carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology. 132:2557–2576. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Hu Z, Zhou Z, Xiong G, Wang Y, Lai Y, Deng L and Yang J: Cyclin D1 G870A polymorphism and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in a Chinese population. Tumour Biol. 35:5607–5612. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Berasain C, Castillo J, Prieto J and Avila MA: New molecular targets for hepatocellular carcinoma: The ErbB1 signaling system. Liver Int. 27:174–185. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Gan FY, Gesell MS, Alousi M and Luk GD: Analysis of ODC and c-myc gene expression in hepatocellular carcinoma by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. J Histochem Cytochem. 41:1185–1196. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Newell P, Toffanin S, Villanueva A, Chiang DY, Minguez B, Cabellos L, Savic R, Hoshida Y, Lim KH, Melgar-Lesmes P, et al: Ras pathway activation in hepatocellular carcinoma and anti-tumoral effect of combined sorafenib and rapamycin in vivo. J Hepatol. 51:725–733. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Edgar R, Domrachev M and Lash AE: Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:207–210. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Elgaaen BV, Olstad OK, Sandvik L, Odegaard E, Sauer T, Staff AC and Gautvik KM: ZNF385B and VEGFA are strongly differentially expressed in serous ovarian carcinomas and correlate with survival. PLoS One. 7:e463172012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Mok SC, Bonome T, Vathipadiekal V, Bell A, Johnson ME, Wong KK, Park DC, Hao K, Yip DK, Donninger H, et al: A gene signature predictive for outcome in advanced ovarian cancer identifies a survival factor: Microfibril-associated glycoprotein 2. Cancer Cell. 16:521–532. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Bowen NJ, Walker LD, Matyunina LV, Logani S, Totten KA, Benigno BB and McDonald JF: Gene expression profiling supports the hypothesis that human ovarian surface epithelia are multipotent and capable of serving as ovarian cancer initiating cells. BMC Med Genomics. 2:712009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Huang DW, Sherman BT, Tan Q, Collins JR, Alvord WG, Roayaei J, Stephens R, Baseler MW, Lane HC and Lempicki RA: The DAVID Gene Functional Classification Tool: A novel biological module-centric algorithm to functionally analyze large gene lists. Genome Biol. 8:R1832007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Kanehisa M: The KEGG database. Novartis Found Symp. 247:91–252. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al: Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 25:25–29. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Franceschini A, Szklarczyk D, Frankild S, Kuhn M, Simonovic M, Roth A, Lin J, Minguez P, Bork P, von Mering C, et al: STRING v9.1: Protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res. 41:D808–D815. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Smoot ME, Ono K, Ruscheinski J, Wang PL and Ideker T: Cytoscape 2.8: New features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics. 27:431–432. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Bandettini WP, Kellman P, Mancini C, Booker OJ, Vasu S, Leung SW, Wilson JR, Shanbhag SM, Chen MY and Arai AE: MultiContrast Delayed Enhancement (MCODE) improves detection of subendocardial myocardial infarction by late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance: A clinical validation study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 14:832012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Gao J, Aksoy BA, Dogrusoz U, Dresdner G, Gross B, Sumer SO, Sun Y, Jacobsen A, Sinha R, Larsson E, et al: Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci Signal. 6:pl12013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Cerami E, Gao J, Dogrusoz U, Gross BE, Sumer SO, Aksoy BA, Jacobsen A, Byrne CJ, Heuer ML, Larsson E, et al: The cBio cancer genomics portal: An open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2:401–404. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Maere S, Heymans K and Kuiper M: BiNGO: A Cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks. Bioinformatics. 21:3448–3449. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Kent WJ, Sugnet CW, Furey TS, Roskin KM, Pringle TH, Zahler AM and Haussler D: The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 12:996–1006. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Chen X, Cheung ST, So S, Fan ST, Barry C, Higgins J, Lai KM, Ji J, Dudoit S, Ng IO, et al: Gene expression patterns in human liver cancers. Mol Biol Cell. 13:1929–1939. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Roessler S, Jia HL, Budhu A, Forgues M, Ye QH, Lee JS, Thorgeirsson SS, Sun Z, Tang ZY, Qin LX, et al: A unique metastasis gene signature enables prediction of tumor relapse in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Cancer Res. 70:10202–10212. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Wurmbach E, Chen YB, Khitrov G, Zhang W, Roayaie S, Schwartz M, Fiel I, Thung S, Mazzaferro V, Bruix J, et al: Genome-wide molecular profiles of HCV-induced dysplasia and hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 45:938–947. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Turner PC, Sylla A, Diallo MS, Castegnaro JJ, Hall AJ and Wild CP: The role of aflatoxins and hepatitis viruses in the etiopathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma: A basis for primary prevention in Guinea-Conakry, West Africa. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 17 Suppl:S441–S448. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Wang Y, Cheng J, Xu C, Liu S, Jiang S, Xu Q, Chen X, Zhuang H and Lu F: Quantitative methylation analysis reveals gender and age differences in p16INK4a hypermethylation in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int. 32:420–428. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

25 

Choi YL, Park SH, Jang JJ and Park CK: Expression of the G1-S modulators in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma and dysplastic nodule: Association of cyclin D1 and p53 proteins with the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Korean Med Sci. 16:424–432. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Snider NT, Altshuler PJ, Wan S, Welling TH, Cavalcoli J and Omary MB: Alternative splicing of human NT5E in cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma produces a negative regulator of ecto-5-nucleotidase (CD73). Mol Biol Cell. 25:4024–4033. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Gill RBS, Day A, Barstow A, Zaman G, Chenu C and Dhoot GK: Mammalian Sulf1 RNA alternative splicing and its significance to tumour growth regulation. Tumour Biol. 33:1669–1680. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Franklin RB, Levy BA, Zou J, Hanna N, Desouki MM, Bagasra O, Johnson LA and Costello LC: ZIP14 zinc transporter downregulation and zinc depletion in the development and progression of hepatocellular cancer. J Gastrointest Cancer. 43:249–257. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Tripathi V, Shen Z, Chakraborty A, Giri S, Freier SM, Wu X, Zhang Y, Gorospe M, Prasanth SG, Lal A, et al: Long noncoding RNA MALAT1 controls cell cycle progression by regulating the expression of oncogenic transcription factor B-MYB. PLoS Genet. 9:e10033682013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Markiewski MM and Lambris JD: Unwelcome complement. Cancer Res. 69:6367–6370. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Abu-Remaileh M and Aqeilan RI: The tumor suppressor WW domain-containing oxidoreductase modulates cell metabolism. Exp Biol Med. 240:345–350. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Roszczenko P, Radomska KA, Wywial E, Collet JF and Jagusztyn-Krynicka EK: A novel insight into the oxidoreductase activity of Helicobacter pylori HP0231 protein. PLoS One. 7:e465632012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Watanuki A, Ohwada S, Fukusato T, Makita F, Yamada T, Kikuchi A and Morishita Y: Prognostic significance of DNA topoisomerase IIalpha expression in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 22:1113–1119. 2002.PubMed/NCBI

34 

Nakajima T, Yasui K, Zen K, Inagaki Y, Fujii H, Minami M, Tanaka S, Taniwaki M, Itoh Y, Arii S, et al: Activation of B-Myb by E2F1 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res. 38:886–895. 2008.PubMed/NCBI

35 

Chan HH, Chu TH, Chien HF, Sun CK, Wang EM, Pan HB, Kuo HM, Hu TH, Lai KH, Cheng JT, et al: Rapid induction of orthotopic hepatocellular carcinoma in immune-competent rats by non-invasive ultrasound-guided cells implantation. BMC Gastroenterol. 10:832010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Wang N, Zhu M, Tsao SW, Man K, Zhang Z and Feng Y: MiR-23a-mediated inhibition of topoisomerase 1 expression potentiates cell response to etoposide in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Cancer. 12:1192013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Wong N, Yeo W, Wong WL, Wong NL, Chan KY, Mo FK, Koh J, Chan SL, Chan AT, Lai PB, et al: TOP2A overexpression in hepatocellular carcinoma correlates with early age onset, shorter patients survival and chemoresistance. Int J Cancer. 124:644–652. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Fritz P, Cabrera CM, Dippon J, Gerteis A, Simon W, Aulitzky WE and van der Kuip H: c-erbB2 and topoisomerase IIalpha protein expression independently predict poor survival in primary human breast cancer: A retrospective study. Breast Cancer Res. 7:R374–R384. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Panvichian R, Tantiwetrueangdet A, Angkathunyakul N and Leelaudomlipi S: TOP2A amplification and overexpression in hepatocellular carcinoma tissues. Biomed Res Int. 2015:3816022015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Dingemans AM, Witlox MA, Stallaert RA, van der Valk P, Postmus PE and Giaccone G: Expression of DNA topoisomerase IIalpha and topoisomerase IIbeta genes predicts survival and response to chemotherapy in patients with small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 5:2048–2058. 1999.PubMed/NCBI

41 

Lazaris AC, Kavantzas NG, Zorzos HS, Tsavaris NV and Davaris PS: Markers of drug resistance in relapsing colon cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 128:114–118. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Costa MJ, Hansen CL, Holden JA and Guinee D Jr: Topoisomerase II alpha: Prognostic predictor and cell cycle marker in surface epithelial neoplasms of the ovary and peritoneum. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 19:248–257. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Zhang Y, Huang W, Ran Y, Xiong Y, Zhong Z, Fan X, Wang Z and Ye Q: miR-582-5p inhibits proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting CDK1 and AKT3. Tumour Biol. 36:8309–8316. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Zhao J, Han SX, Ma JL, Ying X, Liu P, Li J, Wang L, Zhang Y, Ma J, Zhang L, et al: The role of CDK1 in apoptin-induced apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Oncol Rep. 30:253–259. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Guzman JR, Fukuda S and Pelus LM: Inhibition of caspase-3 by Survivin prevents Wee1 Kinase degradation and promotes cell survival by maintaining phosphorylation of p34Cdc2. Gene Ther Mol Biol. 13B:1–273. 2009.

46 

Terrano DT, Upreti M and Chambers TC: Cyclin-dependent kinase 1-mediated Bcl-xL/Bcl-2 phosphorylation acts as a functional link coupling mitotic arrest and apoptosis. Mol Cell Biol. 30:640–656. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Jacquemet G, Green DM, Bridgewater RE, von Kriegsheim A, Humphries MJ, Norman JC and Caswell PT: RCP-driven α5β1 recycling suppresses Rac and promotes RhoA activity via the RacGAP1-IQGAP1 complex. J Cell Biol. 202:917–935. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Bornschein J, Nielitz J, Drozdov I, Selgrad M, Wex T, Jechorek D, Link A, Vieth M and Malfertheiner P: Expression of aurora kinase A correlates with the Wnt-modulator RACGAP1 in gastric cancer. Cancer Med. 5:516–526. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Subramanian R, Ti SC, Tan L, Darst SA and Kapoor TM: Marking and measuring single microtubules by PRC1 and kinesin-4. Cell. 154:377–390. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Chen J, Rajasekaran M, Xia H, Zhang X, Kong SN, Sekar K, Seshachalam VP, Deivasigamani A, Goh BK, Ooi LL, et al: The microtubule-associated protein PRC1 promotes early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in association with the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway. Gut. 65:1522–1534. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Li J, Gao JZ, Du JL, Huang ZX and Wei LX: Increased CDC20 expression is associated with development and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Oncol. 45:1547–1555. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Deng LJ, Peng QL, Wang LH, Xu J, Liu JS, Li YJ, Zhuo ZJ, Bai LL, Hu LP, Chen WM, et al: Arenobufagin intercalates with DNA leading to G2 cell cycle arrest via ATM/ATR pathway. Oncotarget. 6:34258–34275. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

53 

Semaan A, Dietrich D, Bergheim D, Dietrich J, Kalff JC, Branchi V, Matthaei H, Kristiansen G, Fischer HP and Goltz D: CXCL12 expression and PD-L1 expression serve as prognostic biomarkers in HCC and are induced by hypoxia. Virchows Arch. 470:185–196. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

54 

Wang J, Tang X, Weng W, Qiao Y, Lin J, Liu W, Liu R, Ma L, Yu W, Yu Y, et al: The membrane protein melanoma cell adhesion molecule (MCAM) is a novel tumor marker that stimulates tumorigenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene. 34:5781–5795. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

55 

Zhu P, Jin J, Liao Y, Li J, Yu XZ, Liao W and He S: A novel prognostic biomarker SPC24 up-regulated in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget. 6:41383–41397. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

56 

Shi C, Huang D, Lu N, Chen D, Zhang M, Yan Y, Deng L, Lu Q, Lu H and Luo S: Aberrantly activated Gli2-KIF20A axis is crucial for growth of hepatocellular carcinoma and predicts poor prognosis. Oncotarget. 7:26206–26219. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

57 

Gordon CA, Gulzar ZG and Brooks JD: NUSAP1 expression is upregulated by loss of RB1 in prostate cancer cells. Prostate. 75:517–526. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

58 

Jiang W, Wang Z, Chen G and Jia Y: Prognostic significance of centrosomal protein 55 in stage I pulmonary adenocarcinoma after radical resection. Thorac Cancer. 7:316–322. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

59 

Wang Y, Jin T, Dai X and Xu J: Lentivirus-mediated knockdown of CEP55 suppresses cell proliferation of breast cancer cells. Biosci Trends. 10:67–73. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

60 

Weinberger P, Ponny SR, Xu H, et al: Cell cycle M-phase genes are highly upregulated in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid. 27:236–252. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

61 

Wang Z, Katsaros D, Shen Y, Fu Y, Canuto EM, Benedetto C, Lu L, Chu WM, Risch HA and Yu H: Biological and clinical significance of MAD2L1 and BUB1, genes frequently appearing in expression signatures for breast cancer prognosis. PLoS One. 10:e01362462015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

62 

Kawashima SA, Yamagishi Y, Honda T, Ishiguro K and Watanabe Y: Phosphorylation of H2A by Bub1 prevents chromosomal instability through localizing shugoshin. Science. 327:172–177. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

63 

London N and Biggins S: Mad1 kinetochore recruitment by Mps1-mediated phosphorylation of Bub1 signals the spindle checkpoint. Genes Dev. 28:140–152. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

64 

Takashima S, Saito H, Takahashi N, Imai K, Kudo S, Atari M, Saito Y, Motoyama S and Minamiya Y: Strong expression of cyclin B2 mRNA correlates with a poor prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Tumour Biol. 35:4257–4265. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

65 

Lei CY, Wang W, Zhu YT, Fang WY and Tan WL: The decrease of cyclin B2 expression inhibits invasion and metastasis of bladder cancer. Urol Oncol. 34:237.e1–237.e10. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar

66 

Zhao F, Siu MK, Jiang L, Tam KF, Ngan HY, Le XF, Wong OG, Wong ES, Gomes AR, Bella L, et al: Overexpression of forkhead box protein M1 (FOXM1) in ovarian cancer correlates with poor patient survival and contributes to paclitaxel resistance. PLoS One. 9:e1134782014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

67 

Shimo A, Tanikawa C, Nishidate T, Lin ML, Matsuda K, Park JH, Ueki T, Ohta T, Hirata K, Fukuda M, et al: Involvement of kinesin family member 2C/mitotic centromere-associated kinesin overexpression in mammary carcinogenesis. Cancer Sci. 99:62–70. 2008.PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-2017
Volume 38 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Li L, Lei Q, Zhang S, Kong L and Qin B: Screening and identification of key biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma: Evidence from bioinformatic analysis. Oncol Rep 38: 2607-2618, 2017.
APA
Li, L., Lei, Q., Zhang, S., Kong, L., & Qin, B. (2017). Screening and identification of key biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma: Evidence from bioinformatic analysis. Oncology Reports, 38, 2607-2618. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2017.5946
MLA
Li, L., Lei, Q., Zhang, S., Kong, L., Qin, B."Screening and identification of key biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma: Evidence from bioinformatic analysis". Oncology Reports 38.5 (2017): 2607-2618.
Chicago
Li, L., Lei, Q., Zhang, S., Kong, L., Qin, B."Screening and identification of key biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma: Evidence from bioinformatic analysis". Oncology Reports 38, no. 5 (2017): 2607-2618. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2017.5946